Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Prince William County Housing Stats – Feb 2010
Jim Evans
Prudential Carruthers Realtors
Homes in Northern Virginia Meet the Team What’s my Home worth?
Monday, February 22, 2010
IRS clarifies documentation needed for tax credits
The new policy clarifies what documentation taxpayers need to submit to obtain either credit. When Congress revised the programs in November, it ordered the IRS to tighten its rules and monitoring to curtail widespread fraud that had emerged last year.
This included fictitious home purchases in which people received $8,000 checks from the government for transactions that had never occurred. In some cases, federal auditors found that fraud ringleaders were submitting multiple claims for credits and splitting the government payouts with people who had no financial ability to buy a house.
To avoid such abuses in the revised credit program -- which is scheduled to be available for qualified purchases closed through June 30 -- Congress directed the IRS to spell out documentation standards in detail and to install monitoring systems to spot fraud upfront. Among the keys to the monitoring system is that all documentation accompanying credit claims must comply with the IRS's detailed rules. Here's what the agency wants from anyone seeking a credit:
-- A fully executed IRS Form 5405 (available at http://irs.gov) on which taxpayers provide basic information supporting their claim of eligibility, including income and home purchase date.
-- A copy of the settlement statement proving that the sale and purchase transactions actually took place. In instructions to taxpayers issued last month, the IRS said the settlement statement should show "all parties' names and signatures, property address, sales price, and date of purchase. Normally this is the properly executed Form HUD-1."
The problem, however, is that home closing and settlement customs vary from state to state, and sometimes the HUD-1 does not contain both the seller's and the buyer's signatures. In escrow states such as California, where settlements are not sit-down affairs bringing together sellers and buyers, both sets of signatures might not appear on the HUD-1 received by the buyer.
In California, buyers sign an estimated closing statement or an estimated HUD-1 "at the time they sign their loan documents," said Donna Grosso, president of the California Escrow Association. Sellers have their "estimated closing submitted to them for their review and signature during or near the same time period as the buyer. We prepare the final closing statement or the final HUD-1 on the closing date," which is the date of recordation.
As a result, Grosso said, "we do not have the buyers or sellers available to sign the final closing statement." This seems to create an obstacle to meeting the IRS's instructions and makes it more likely that applicants' claims will be rejected or delayed for special review.
The agency tried to address that issue Feb. 12 by loosening its requirements. "In areas where signatures are not required on the settlement document, the IRS has clarified that it will accept a settlement statement if it is completed and valid according to local law," the agency said. "The IRS encourages those buyers to sign the settlement statement prior to attaching it to the tax return.
In situations where the signature of the seller is not on the settlement document, the IRS advises the buyer to still sign the document."
Despite the fact that Form 5405 continues to require all parties' signatures on the HUD-1 or settlement document, the agency is now essentially saying: "Don't worry about it. As long as your settlement statement conforms to prevailing local practices, we'll accept it."
This could be important for large numbers of repeat and first-time buyers who are planning to file for the credit with this year's tax returns and want to be sure they get through the IRS's tougher standards. Nationwide, according to estimates by the National Association of Realtors, 1.5 million repeat purchasers and 900,000 first-timers are expected to apply for credits this year.
What else does the IRS want to see on claims from home buyers? For repeat purchasers, the agency wants documentation that, before their latest purchase, they had lived in their former property for a consecutive five years out of the past eight years. This may include property tax records, hazard insurance records or copies of annual mortgage interest statements filed with their federal taxes.
One caveat for filers: Because of the increased documentation and monitoring, IRS processing will take four to eight weeks. So don't expect your $6,500 or $8,000 check overnight.
IRS clarifies the housing tax credit.
Monday, February 15, 2010
Local Market activity through January 2010
Absorption Rate* comparing August 2009 thru January 2010:
AUG | SEP | OCT | NOV | DEC | JAN | |
Under 249,999 | 71 days | 130 days | 115 days | 120 days | 143 days | 156 days |
250,000 - 299,999 | 110 days | 106 days | 99 days | 97 days | 115 days | 165 days |
300,000 - 399,999 | 88 days | 83 days | 94 days | 85 days | 95 days | 148 days |
400,000 - 499,999 | 82 days | 83 days | 101 days | 82 days | 108 days | 133 days |
Over 500,000 | 131 days | 176 days | 193 days | 160 days | 128 days | 220 days |
DULLES ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS (LOUDOUN COUNTY)
January listings compared to December: Increased 6% to 1,914.
January sales units compared to December: Decreased 37% to 247.
January 2010 Sales Units compared to January 2009 Sales Units: Decreased 13%.
The average sold price for all homes for January was $382,668, Up 17% compared to 2009.
Absorption Rate* comparing August 2009 thru January 2010:
AUG | SEP | OCT | NOV | DEC | JAN | |
Under 249,999 | 132 days | 122 days | 129 days | 137 days | 132 days | 179 days |
250,000 - 299,999 | 101 days | 136 days | 109 days | 89 days | 83 days | 162 days |
300,000 - 399,999 | 97 days | 92 days | 99 days | 106 days | 101 days | 153 days |
400,000 - 499,999 | 145 days | 153 days | 114 days | 163 days | 120 days | 280 days |
Over 500,000 | 193 days | 235 days | 253 days | 249 days | 188 days | 427 days |
PRINCE WILLIAM ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
January listings compared to December: Increased 3% to 2,696.
January sales units compared to December: Decreased 19% to 466.
January 2010 Sales Units compared to January 2009 Sales Units: Decreased 42%
The average sold price for all homes for January was $243,020, Up 20% compared to 2009.
Absorption Rate* comparing August 2009 thru January 2010.
AUG | SEP | OCT | NOV | DEC | JAN | |
Under 249,999 | 96 days | 108 days | 102 days | 106 days | 124 days | 145 days |
250,000 - 299,999 | 148 days | 132 days | 100 days | 110 days | 134 days | 153 days |
300,000 - 399,999 | 121 days | 139 days | 128 days | 129 days | 116 days | 171 days |
400,000 - 499,999 | 146 days | 153 days | 164 days | 179 days | 152 days | 248 days |
Over 500,000 | 311 days | 325 days | 398 days | 336 days | 392 days | 422 days |
*Absorption Rate is the number of days, at current rates of sale, that would be required to dispose of current inventory, provided no additional listings are added to the market. This calculation accurately tracks market conditions and has been used by the home building industry for more than 30 years.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Mortgage demand at six-week highs on refinance wave - Yahoo! News
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Demand for home loans rose to a six-week high on a mini refinance wave, with borrowers pushing to lock in rates before they climb later this year, the Mortgage Bankers Association said on Wednesday,
Applications to buy homes and refinance loans jumped last week to mid-December levels as average 30-year mortgage rates held near 5 percent.
The industry group's mortgage index jumped 21 percent last week, fueled by a 26.3 percent leap in demand for refinancing as purchase loan requests increased 10.3 percent.
The 30-year mortgage rate dipped 0.01 percentage point to 5.01 percent.
But this borrowing cost was 0.40 percentage point above the record low set last March and seen headed higher throughout the year.
"Rates continue to hover around 5 percent, quite low by historical standards, but are well above the record lows seen in 2009 and hence are not generating substantial refi volume," said Michael Fratantoni, MBA's vice president of research and economics.
Last spring when mortgage rates hit rock bottom, the index for refinance applications was more than double its current level.
Nonetheless, as the U.S. housing market claws its way out of the worst crash since the Great Depression there are increasing signs that the important spring selling season could be relatively healthy.
Affordability remains high with mortgage rates still historically low and average home prices plunging about 30 percent from 2006 peaks before stabilizing since last summer.
The government's bonus to first-time and move-up buyers via a tax credit remains in place for several more months, luring buyers who have been sitting on the sidelines waiting for some signs of stability.
Qualified borrowers who sign purchase contracts by April 30 and close on loans by the end of June can get an $8,000 first-time buyer credit or $6,500 move-up credit.
Each set of housing data brings with it the debate about whether this key segment of the U.S. economy can sustain once the government incentives disappear.
A modest December rise in pending sales of existing homes, which are based on signed contracts, after a steep November drop suggested that the housing rebound would come in fits and starts.
"I do think the housing recovery in the U.S. still has legs and is firmly in tact," said Ian Pollick, economics strategist at TD Securities in Toronto. "There's a lot of pent up demand in the system right now, there are a lot of really really good deals."
The rise in mortgage rates is seen as gradual this year with the Federal Reserve committing to keeping interest rates low for an extended period.
One of the wild cards is the pace at which banks start putting foreclosed properties up for sale. Those sales are also expected to be measured, to prevent a second price swoon that results in a double-dip for housing.
"Taken as a whole I have a big thumbs up for the housing market," said Pollick. "I really do think that the recovery is sustainable and I really do think that we've seen the worst in the rearview mirror."
The worst may be behind us. Sounds like a good time to buy to me!
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Treasury to Cut Foreclosure Relief Paperwork
Daily Real Estate News | January 28, 2010 |
Treasury to Cut Foreclosure Relief Paperwork
The Treasury Department is announcing a plan Thursday to reduce the burdensome paperwork surrounding the foreclosure relief plan.
Source: The Associated Press, Alan Zibel (01/27/2010)